Minggu, 17 Juli 2011

ipod touch 3g

ipod touch 3g. ipod touch 3g

  • ipod touch 3g





  • macaddict06
    Jul 21, 03:00 PM
    Noo...! My MacBook is out of date before its even arrived :eek:!!!!!!

    Well, no it's not.
    1) it is just as fast now as it will be when you get it (read: speed won't decline)
    2) As a computer owner, you know something better is coming. It's just like buying a car - buy for what you need now, worry about upgrading when the time comes
    3) The MacBook won't see an upgrade for a few months - maybe a speed bump in September, but otherwise, I wouldn't expect Core2Duo in it by maybe December or MWSF '07. Till then, your MB will be perfectly fine.





    ipod touch 3g. ipod touch 3G

  • ipod touch 3G





  • dukebound85
    Apr 10, 12:52 PM
    In regards to calculators and OSX spotlight
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculator_input_methods
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations


    With the immediate execution mode of operation each binary operation is executed as soon as the next operator is pressed, therefore the order of operations in a mathematical expression is not taken into account. Scientific calculators have buttons for brackets and these calculators can take order of operation in to account


    Different calculators follow different orders of operations. Most non-scientific calculators without a stack work left to right without any priority given to different operators

    while more sophisticated calculators will use a more standard priority


    Who said that this an equation? What is the variable that is unknown?

    2 is still winning!

    Well it is an equation as it is the same as as saying x=48/2(9+3)





    ipod touch 3g. iPod touch (3G)

  • iPod touch (3G)





  • iStudentUK
    Apr 10, 12:55 PM
    Who said that this an equation? What is the variable that is unknown?

    2 is still winning!

    Means nothing. Either answer would be correct- it is ambiguous. Using "/" notation is poor practice. I believe, for the reasons I stated a few posts ago (post 146), the author would intend an interpretation leading to 288.





    ipod touch 3g. Jailbreak Ipod Touch 3G

  • Jailbreak Ipod Touch 3G





  • decimortis
    Apr 25, 08:59 AM
    It's a non-issue.

    Sent from your iPhone.





    ipod touch 3g. Jailbreak iPod touch 3G with

  • Jailbreak iPod touch 3G with





  • Unspeaked
    Aug 11, 04:24 PM
    The MacBook is a "consumer" model. The Pro is for the "Professional", although I'm some sort of a "professional", and my MacBook suits me just fine. (I liked the form factor and the keyboard.) Stuffed with 2G of RAM and a 100G 7.2K drive it runs OS X, Windows & CentOS (via Parallels desktop) just fine. It's like a digital Swiss Army knife - I haven't found much it can't do reasonably well. :o

    I second this opinion.

    There's nothing I've hit that a MacBook can't handle as well as I was hoping for, and most things it does even quicker than I thought it would.

    And I'm in that "sort of pro" catagory, as well.





    ipod touch 3g. iPod Touch 3G/4G,

  • iPod Touch 3G/4G,





  • Moyank24
    May 5, 01:52 AM
    I'm going to go wayyyyyy out on the proverbial limb here and suggest that since mscriv knows the full map at the outset of the game, that he's going to pretty much lay traps or monsters in each or every other room we enter- especially the ones where there is only one door for us to enter into another room.

    Perhaps we should reconsider the splitting up or else we will be picked off one at a time.

    Thoughts? I'm just musing out loud. I'm sure my darling Beatrice will correct me or tell me what my thoughts should be anyhow. :p

    The only trepidation I have against splitting up so soon is that we'll be weaker apart. But, on the other hand the longer we wait the chances of the monsters being stronger are better.

    And my darling husband, I'm just in it for the alimony. ;)





    ipod touch 3g. apple ipod touch 3g 8gb.

  • apple ipod touch 3g 8gb.





  • 42streetsdown
    May 6, 01:48 AM
    This seems unlikely. The PPC to Intel switch was a result of Apple not being impressed by both IBM and Motorola's lack of interest in continuing the advances in the PowerPC architecture. Intel's current architecture and future planned architectures are still of great interest to apple and consumers. There isn't enough motivation (unless some huge new breakthrough in ARM tech is in the works.)
    The PPC-Intel transition was confusing for many consumers and a pain for developers. I don't think Apple is likely to put us through it again.





    ipod touch 3g. ipod touch 3g. ipod touch 3g.

  • ipod touch 3g. ipod touch 3g.





  • xPismo
    Jul 21, 05:24 PM
    If Intel really can start shipping merom by early August...WWDC would be a perfectly fine place to introduce new MacBook Pros. But I doubt they'll be ready that early.

    Personally, I think its about time we have a major case revision. The aluminum PowerBooks have been out for almost three years (september '03 I believe). Don't get me wrong; current design is great: its functional and elegant, but change has to come eventually...

    True, but I like my Alu book look - I'd have no problem with a intel powered version. Although marketing being marketing, I'd like to see something new fresh, and awesome too.

    BTW ebuc, your sig is nearly exactly what I'm planning on having. Looking at a cube 450 for a home server, and I already have a 20gb iPod. Cubes, insanely great.





    ipod touch 3g. Apple+ipod+touch+3g

  • Apple+ipod+touch+3g





  • SerenityInt
    Apr 5, 01:15 PM
    The only thing uglier than a Scion is a Scion iPhone theme.





    ipod touch 3g. Pictures of iPod touch 3g 8gb

  • Pictures of iPod touch 3g 8gb





  • doctor-don
    Apr 25, 10:56 AM
    I like Steves sense of brevity.

    Perhaps if people bothered to look up some info on what they were talking about before they went off half-cocked about the latest hyped paranoia...

    News media will do practically anything to attract viewers / listeners / readers, even if the conclusions are incorrect.





    ipod touch 3g. iPod Touch 3G

  • iPod Touch 3G





  • leekohler
    May 7, 01:49 AM
    I remember in elementary school, learning about the metric system since we were all going to switch to it. That never happened. I wonder why....

    Because the USA is full of too many dumb MFs. That is your answer. We should have been using it 20 years ago.





    ipod touch 3g. iPod touch doesn#39;t have 3g

  • iPod touch doesn#39;t have 3g





  • moobookpro
    Sep 16, 04:04 PM
    Aye, and I have noticed that Apple was very smart to market their line as notebooks rather than laptops. A notebook you put on a table and have less of a chance of getting another "McDonald's hot coffee burns lap" suit. :eek:

    ***Waiting for the "Caution: This notebook may burn you lap" warning sticker***

    I would just like to note (yes, pun intended) that all computer manufacturers refer to their portable computers as notebooks. The only people that still call them laptops are consumers.





    ipod touch 3g. for the “iPod touch 3G”

  • for the “iPod touch 3G”





  • spaceballl
    Mar 27, 12:27 AM
    That's all wonderful, but can I have 64GB on my iPhone now? OK THX.





    ipod touch 3g. for the iPod touch 3G and

  • for the iPod touch 3G and





  • Don't panic
    Apr 11, 07:06 AM
    are we still debating over this?

    if we stay to basic math, it depends on how you read the / sign

    if it only refers to the immediately following expression then you'd have
    (48/2)*(9+3)=288

    if it refers to everything following, then you'd have
    48/[2*(9+3)]=2

    it is poorly written (or more likely purposely ambiguously written), but in such cases the left-to-right rule should prevail, making it 288. on the other hand, square brackets are way cooler than round brackets, making 2 the cool answer.

    if we move to postadvanced math however, it is clear that "/" separates two expressions: 48 and 2(9+3);
    - as someone already mentioned above, absence of the operator implies multiplication, so 48=4*8. now, everyone knows that by the reciprocal inversity properties multiplication is the opposite of division, therefore 4 multiplied by 8 must be equal to 8 divided by 4, which is most obviously 2 (on the left part of the expression);
    - now to the right part. this is easy. Ignoring the round bracket (which as mentioned are uncool), you have 2*9+3, which gives you a very straightforward 21;
    - so now we have 2/21, which as demonstrated above is equal to 21*2, which is (i hope no one disagrees on this) 42.

    so please now stop with your earthlingy bickering: the answer is always 42. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:





    ipod touch 3g. Comparing iPod Touch (3G

  • Comparing iPod Touch (3G





  • ticman
    Nov 13, 01:57 PM
    My concern with A windshield mount is all the wires hanging down. Two if using power cord and speaker cord.

    Thoughts or comments?





    ipod touch 3g. With 2nd Gen iPod Touch,

  • With 2nd Gen iPod Touch,





  • Moyank24
    May 4, 04:33 PM
    yep. and he knows where all the treasures are so he can protect them with his minions.

    the worst part is that we don't know if and how many points he had at the beginning, and/or if any monster or trap was pre-placed in the mansion. Nor we know the 'price-list" and stats of monsters and trap (all of which i think we should)

    the good part is that the villain is dumb as a bell so he probably placed all the traps and monsters to guard his barbie-doll collection ;)

    beatrice, that part is outdated and has been superseded by a more updated interpretation of how traps work. i think post 47 is a more current version of the rules.

    so, where do you want to go?


    Ahh, ok. I'm only really trying to check back with the OP to avoid further confusion. And yes, to the door at the end of the hallway.

    And goodness, Beatrice makes me feel like I'm 100 years old.





    ipod touch 3g. Apple iPod touch 3G

  • Apple iPod touch 3G





  • GGJstudios
    Dec 13, 10:59 PM
    In the meantime, as the Mac user we have some responsibility not to spread Windows viruses to PCs when technology is there.
    No, we do NOT have any responsibility to protect Windows users from viruses. It is each computer user's responsibility to protect themselves. Even if every Mac ran antivirus, Windows users are still at a much greater risk from other sources of malware. The common sense approach is for every Windows user to run their own antivirus to protect themselves from malware, whether that malware comes from a Mac user or another source. Mac users do not have a responsibility to burden their computers with AV apps, just because some Windows users may be careless enough to run without AV protection.

    Mac Virus/Malware Info (http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=9400648&postcount=4)

    I used AppDelete and it took off everything except the icon on my top bar. When I click on the icon, it says there are updates available... dooooh...
    AppDelete left a lot more than that behind. Application removal apps are ineffective (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=10903768#post10903768). Manual removal (http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=11171082&postcount=16) is more complete and reliable.





    ipod touch 3g. ipod touch 3g back. ipod touch

  • ipod touch 3g back. ipod touch





  • Kenn Marks
    Mar 28, 11:54 AM
    Glad to read about Mac.
    No so happy to read about the lack of iPhone hardware till possibly Sept :rolleyes:. I think if their going to wait until September, then we really need to consider the possibility of an LTE iPhone.

    Considering Steve said "2011 was the year of the iPad" he could be right by having it be Apple's Fiscal Year 2011. Then introduce the iPhone 5 and iPad 3 both with LTE and other enhancements in September ready for a Holiday buying frenzy. Of course introducing two blockbuster products would definitely stretch production capabilities and lines 6 blocks long waiting to get ones hands on one.





    ipod touch 3g. for the iPod Touch 3G,

  • for the iPod Touch 3G,





  • ericinboston
    Apr 18, 04:19 PM
    Samsung will simply pay a hefty amount to Apple and we will never hear anything about this again.

    Exactly. And how different has/is Windows 9x/XP been from Mac OS (and vice versa) over the past 15 years? What about tvs? Receivers?

    Come on...the iPhone look/feel has been out for quite awhile anyway...it's not like the competitors released products 6 months after the iPhone.

    Regardless of how many examples we can list here, this lawsuit ridiculous...a lot of things/products in life are going to look/feel very similar...especially in computers.





    rdowns
    Apr 14, 09:44 AM
    Long and very interesting article on taxes. Very good read. (http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-17350-9_things_the_rich_dont_want_you_to_know_about_taxes.html)


    As millions of Americans prepare to file their annual taxes, they do so in an environment of media-perpetuated tax myths. Here are a few points about taxes and the economy that you may not know, to consider as you prepare to file your taxes. (All figures are inflation-adjusted.)

    The Internal Revenue Service issues an annual report on the 400 highest income-tax payers. In 1961, there were 398 taxpayers who made $1 million or more, so I compared their income tax burdens from that year to 2007.

    Despite skyrocketing incomes, the federal tax burden on the richest 400 has been slashed, thanks to a variety of loopholes, allowable deductions and other tools. The actual share of their income paid in taxes, according to the IRS, is 16.6 percent. Adding payroll taxes barely nudges that number.

    Compare that to the vast majority of Americans, whose share of their income going to federal taxes increased from 13.1 percent in 1961 to 22.5 percent in 2007.

    (By the way, during seven of the eight George W. Bush years, the IRS report on the top 400 taxpayers was labeled a state secret, a policy that the Obama administration overturned almost instantly after his inauguration.)

    A corporate tax rate that is too low actually destroys jobs. That�s because a higher tax rate encourages businesses (who don�t want to pay taxes) to keep the profits in the business and reinvest, rather than pull them out as profits and have to pay high taxes.

    The 2004 American Jobs Creation Act, which passed with bipartisan support, allowed more than 800 companies to bring profits that were untaxed but overseas back to the United States. Instead of paying the usual 35 percent tax, the companies paid just 5.25 percent.

    The companies said bringing the money home��repatriating� it, they called it�would mean lots of jobs. Sen. John Ensign, the Nevada Republican, put the figure at 660,000 new jobs.

    Pfizer, the drug company, was the biggest beneficiary. It brought home $37 billion, saving $11 billion in taxes. Almost immediately it started firing people. Since the law took effect, Pfizer has let 40,000 workers go. In all, it appears that at least 100,000 jobs were destroyed.





    iApples
    Apr 10, 02:42 AM
    Again, I'd like to warn people: this is not always true. Even if you enter it exactly as above, your calculator will not always give you 288. Some will give you two. Some settings may give you two. Don't trust a calculator blindly.

    Reset your settings to default and you'll get 288. I've tried it on 7 calculators that I've found around the house. 6 of them equalled to 288 and the 7th one equalled to 2. But that calculator did not have the numbers entered exactly as in the OP. Or you can go try it on Google. Google doesn't lie.

    Looks like your sarcasm is on par with you math. When you have to explain sarcasm, it's not really sarcastic.

    It must be on par with your math skills then. Horrible.





    Dagless
    Mar 30, 06:47 AM
    If Apple moved to America then I'd have to stop buying their products. They're already quite expensive now. If that price jumped up then I'd just buy a competitors product instead.

    Infact one has to wonder if there are more US nationalists than people who like cheap products. Somehow I don't think it'd involve a narrow margin.

    Right now Apple products are priced well and their production quality is very high. Why would we need to change that?





    P-Worm
    Apr 7, 10:02 AM
    I see the short sighted Apple pom-pom shakers are once again giddy with excitement. The juvenile remarks are embarrassing.

    For some strange reason you think monopolies are good for consumers.

    How is Apple a monopoly in this case? There is nothing stopping other companies from entering the LCD business and making more displays. Just because Apple has a lot of money to buy things does not make them a monopoly.

    P-Worm





    hobo.hopkins
    Mar 29, 04:34 PM
    Thousands of people are dying in Japan and all you idiots care about is iPod Touch batteries? That's kind of... selfish.

    How dare people think of themselves in any way when something bad has occurred in the world. People in Darfur have been dying for quite some time now and I haven't thought of myself or my interests once since conflicts began. That's what a good person does.

    Do you see how ridiculous you're being? There is no reason a person can't be concerned with supply shortages AND the Japanese people. They aren't mutually exclusive. Moreover, if you follow your flawed logic then no one could ever do anything for themselves. Horrific events happen everyday worldwide; tragedies can't stop us from living.

    Tidak ada komentar:

    Posting Komentar